the only support youll get for this system are from people who suck, or cant win unless its really laggy.

the old system required you to win, and play, this one lets any old person get lucky and be in the top spot, and then they say their hot shit, and they lost cause of lag. its a horrible system, too faulty.

the other one, of course, wasnt perfect, but it was much better than this new, unstable one.

meh, who agrees? i say we bring back the old one.

I think we should remove this one, don't bring back the old one, but bring in a system where it is done by winning percentage, butyou can only be on the list is if you play 25 games atleast, and you have to play 30 games at least per week.

i agree, but not with the 30 games a week system.

Do you mean we should remove it copletely, make it higher or make it lower??

lower, or not at all.

So are you saying after you play 25 games you could stay up there for life??

(#### I hate the bugs on this forum. It says I have one reply.)

no, no...i think there should be a system that takes the win/loss ratio and makes it a percentile, thus proving who has the most wins/loss's, i still think we should have these points, but they shouldnt mean anything.

the frigggen ranking system hmmmmm.........how many agree that you shood get at least a 100 points a game if you beat someone under your rank.

that would defeat the purpous of it...just scrap it all together, its horrid and faulty.

well ok

Either way, I believe there should be a hall of fame. For the vets and old schoolers who've been around. I think that is just about respect.

The whole Championship belt thing is a neat idea. Defend it anytime, but make it where you'd have to defend it at least 3 times a week (this is for YOU, Nferno999, who doesn't fight anyone you know is better). And anyone in the top 20 get an automatic shot at least once.

I dunno.. just an idea :)

sounds good, akuma.

the old ran was based on win and loss percentage.
i ws 1st with like 400 wins and about 40 loses and 2nd had about 500 and 100 loses once

u were 1st once????????????
hmmmmm......
never seem u there but u will be 1st day.
:)

Havoc: I was first when Tmyapp was resetting the scores it didn't last long just when he was resetting but it felt good:biggrin:
but after you left I was in the top 5 for a ehile then top ten
Noticed when you cam,e back I went down further:sad:{the sad emticon is not working}
Havoc is here
feel the Havoc
to be continued....................................

(Edited by inclusive at 3:16 am on Dec. 8, 2001)

hehe yeah i remember those days :biggrin:

Then Inc had a real bad lossing streak and fell realy low....now he's back up there amongst the kings last i checked.

we are getting lots more players and the top 20 are pretty #### good i must admit :biggrin:

and a few of the 30-50 crowd can pull a few fast ones on ya if you aint carefull :biggrin:

but fighting your way through the lag of the top 5 is gonna be tough Inc.

and there is a hall of fame/shame it's on Warmors page...contact him tell him who should be in those lists...help him develope his page.And maybe get some noterighity for your selves.

<span style='font-size:10pt;line-height:100%'>Warmor's Official Xmen Vs. Street Fighter Online Fan Club</span>

(Edited by nosoul4evr at 3:36 am on Dec. 8, 2001)

INC will you please spend &#3640 and stop being a cheap ass with emulators!!! (I REALLY hate emulators.)

please, tm?