SFO Archive Forums - Street fighter vs. dragon ball(not counting gt....

SFO Archive Forums (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/index.php)

- General (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)

- - Street fighter vs. dragon ball(not counting gt.... - Or anything contradtcing the manga) (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/showthread.php?t=15686)

Quote:

wait, if gen purified his soul, why can't the z fighers do the same? how did he purify his soul? is there something you are not tell us?

princevegeta, you just took the words out of my mouth

Quote:

Every time Akuma used the technique he came out unscathed. Thusly by determination of the occurences in the story, the attack is NOT a Kamikaze attack.

Well, by the description of the attack, that must be another one of the plotholes in SF storyline. If the attack affects ppl who have committed sins and killed ppl, then it should affect Akuma also

Quote:

I can understand the androids not having a soul because Android 16 never comes back when everybody else who was killed by Cell is resurrected.

And neither did Android 17. ONly 18 came back, and that was because the wish was directed specifically at her

Quote:

Oro's EX Yagyou Dama is where he rips off his sling and leaps into the air and forms an energy ball that takes up half the screen and hurls it at the person. It is one of the most damaging attacks in the Street Fighter world.

Can you give me a power-wise comparison to a DBZ attack?

Quote:

Buu most certainly has a soul because Shenron resurrects Kid Buu as Ubuu, purified of his evil. Because he can be resurrected, that means that Buu has a soul, unlike Android 16 who can't be resurrected.

I figured it out. It wasn't Buu's soul that was resurrected into Ubuu. It was the soul of the Dai Kaioshin that Buu absorbed when he was first created by Bibidi. Therefore, it was the soul of the Dai Kaioshin that was brought back, not of Buu

Android 18 was never killed. She was just barfed up by Cell if you recall, and the explosives were removed from her body using the wish.

They explain Akuma's ability to not die from the Shun Goku Satsu by saying that he knows how to defend himself in Hell. Once again, that is not a very good explanation, but it is the explanation nonetheless.

The EX Yagyou Dama may be comporable to the Genki Dama, but it would depend on how long he concentrated on it. It is a very large and incredibly damaging attack when he just hops up and throws it without concentrating. If he concentrated, it could be just as powerful or even more than the Genki Dama. It also doesn't matter if you throw it at somebody who's killed millions or a little kid full of innocence... it'll still hurt 'em. In that sense it is better than the Genki Dama, because it is not conditional.

Dai Kaioushin is forever a part of Fat Buu, which is the reason that Fat Buu is fat in the first place. Kid Buu had no fighters absorbed to resurrect as part of him.

if it's as powerful as the genki dama, then it would be powerful enough to destroy a planet?

If he concentrated for long enough it could.

i believe that statement is "theoretical" , it looks fckin big and it can make fckin big explosions, but destroying a planet is a totally different story.

Quote:

there is absolutely NO sf character(except maybe gill) that can manipulate ki as well as DBZ characters. so none of the SF characters can stop dbz beams or ki attacks.

Oro

[quote]
2. their bodies can

lol

well, yeah, that's what i said from the beginning. sf wins with 100% credit to gill. otherwise, dbz wins. there is no fckin way that oro or akuma has ki manipulation capabilities of dbz characters.

You've never seen Oro or you might say otherwise.

Gill = a God
Goku = a scrub

Squish.

Dan, you still never explained how Gen purified his soul. Because that is a VERY big advantage on the part of DBZ if they purify their souls.

Quote:

Quote

And the attack cannot affect Goten, Trunks, and Goku, because seriously, they never killed anyone. Goku didn't kill Radditsu, Piccolo did. Goku never killed Baata or Rikum, he only crippled them. Vegeta killed them. Goku never killed Furiza, only crippled him. He also never killed any of the androids, none of the Cell Jrs, or Buu (since Goku didnt' kill Buu, the ppl of earth did) Therefore, Goku has never killed anyone, and is unaffected by the Satsu. Same goes for Goten and Trunks. They never killed anyone, and therefore are unaffected by the Satsu

in a nut shell, doing something bad is a sin.

First off, Goten and Trunks have never done anything bad. Second off, judgment of what is considered good and what is bad is relative and not defined in a set of morals. Originally, when you were arguing the SGS, you said past evils, like killing someone. Now, all of a sudden, you're talking about doing a teeny tiny bad thing or disobeying a parent. Give me a break

And the SGS is a super move, is it not? WHich means that a DBZ fighter may be able to end the fight against Akuma before Akuma gathers enough "super bar" energy to unleash the SGS

GRRR... I said that Capcom THEMSELVES never explained how he did it, so I can't tell you how it happened!

Goku killed in Dragonball.

Goten and Trunks, Goten and Trunks... well, they weren't exactly the most well-behaved children in the world, but at the same time they never killed anybody. Despite this, they aren't strong enough to take Akuma when he doesn't use the SGS.

I have always said that my argument for the SGS is based on past murders.

DBZ characters pull out a Kame Hame Ha without charging up a little meter for them, right? SGS can be done like that too.