![]() |
[quote:post_uid0="Roll"]3) Forget Cammy, put in SAKURA! XD[/quote]
sorry roll but SAKURA is not who we are talking about anyhow SAKURA is not a xm are a sf sorry roll :( |
[quote:post_uid0="ajtimbs"][quote:post_uid0="Roll"]3) Forget Cammy, put in SAKURA! XD[/quote]
sorry roll but SAKURA is not who we are talking about anyhow SAKURA is not a xm are a sf sorry roll :([/quote] dubya tee eff? Sukura is a Sf char.. And is in thie game. |
Well i think we should all pull together to get a character that will be easy and fast to make. So we wont have to wait so long and we will be able to vote faster. And i think i remember TMyApp saying if we voted for iron man he would add war machine as well. So lets say we voted cammy=> gambit=> dan=>storm=>ken=>rouge=>akuma=>sabertooth=>...
|
forget cammy we need the ironman &warmachine come on look at it 2 for 1 vote. Or da man AKUMA!
|
I got a bit of idea. TMy should put something like "TMy's choice". He could say
"To the fans, I'm recommend *such and such characters*, because their engines are based on characters that are already in the game, and so would be developed much faster. This is optional, just a suggestion for the fans." That way, the people can vote for the characters that will be done considerably quicker, if they like. However, they can still vote for their characters. Here are my predictions for "Tmys choice" - Based on the Ryu Engine Ken or Akuma. They are both VERY close to Ryu. Except for maybe Akumas raging demon, that will probably be the same deal as Weapon X - it won't be implemented for a LOONG while cause it's so fancy/complicated, etc. - Based on the Wolverine Engine Sabretooth. As much as I hate to say it, they do have some considerable similarities. They both share a special and a hyper (berserker barrage, or claw for sabre). Based on the ChunLi, cyclops, and sentinel Well, I don't know. Someone take up the torch. Oh yeah, Tmyap said characters from SF. Even if they are in SFA3, still SF, so I guess they're still eligible. Edit: Oh yes, SSJKarma, do you have any images of "Armored Spiderman"? I'm a big spiderman, I'd love to see it. |
[quote:post_uid0="XtremetheZealot"]I got a bit of idea. TMy should put something like "TMy's choice". He could say
"To the fans, I'm recommend *such and such characters*, because their engines are based on characters that are already in the game, and so would be developed much faster. This is optional, just a suggestion for the fans." That way, the people can vote for the characters that will be done considerably quicker, if they like. However, they can still vote for their characters. Here are my predictions for "Tmys choice" - Based on the Ryu Engine Ken or Akuma. They are both VERY close to Ryu. Except for maybe Akumas raging demon, that will probably be the same deal as Weapon X - it won't be implemented for a LOONG while cause it's so fancy/complicated, etc. - Based on the Wolverine Engine Sabretooth. As much as I hate to say it, they do have some considerable similarities. They both share a special and a hyper (berserker barrage, or claw for sabre). Based on the ChunLi, cyclops, and sentinel Well, I don't know. Someone take up the torch. Oh yeah, Tmyap said characters from SF. Even if they are in SFA3, still SF, so I guess they're still eligible. Edit: Oh yes, SSJKarma, do you have any images of "Armored Spiderman"? I'm a big spiderman, I'd love to see it.[/quote] yah people, it would be better because if U vote for characters that have the same engine has already playable characters, we will have more char faster and after that TMy App will have all the time to do the complicated char........anyway.......Spidey took a lot of time because of that........but I guess some people are just stubborn.......:biggrin: |
well, armored spidey is just plain old spiderman except his colors are GREY and BLACK... which is the old reliable SPIDEY ARMOR peter had make for himself ! can't remember the episode it was in !
well, in MSHvsSF... ARMORED SPIDEY is a hidden character. he is harder to knock on the ground, but still has all the moves he has, basically its just another version of good old spiderman. but that version is harder to knock out ! |
[quote:post_uid0="SSJKarma"]well, armored spidey is just plain old spiderman except his colors are GREY and BLACK... which is the old reliable SPIDEY ARMOR peter had make for himself ! can't remember the episode it was in !
well, in MSHvsSF... ARMORED SPIDEY is a hidden character. he is harder to knock on the ground, but still has all the moves he has, basically its just another version of good old spiderman. but that version is harder to knock out ![/quote] isn't it when he meets all the different peter parkers from other dimension and the rich one is the one with the Armored costume? I think it's this one........ |
[quote:post_uid0="nosoul4evr"]Well...TMy will hold a public vote,for who "we" think should be the next character.
however I agree with you that, "Cammy should be next." my reasons vary from yours. I have only 2 reasons why..... <ul>[*] We "should" have another female character added to the game. (we currently only have 1 female fighter. Im sure the female players out there would enjoy having the choice to play more than 1 "girly" character in the game) [*]It "should" be a Street Fighter. (xmen out number street fighters at the moment)[/list]So when it comes time to vote for the next character introduced to the game... I will be voting Cammy, for game equality and balance. (even though she is not my favorite XvsSF character)[/quote] techinly Maybe we should have a FEMALE street fighter. Also team marvel ( x-men)is on a number increase over team capcom (street fighter) :laughlong: :laughlong: |
[quote:post_uid0="ajtimbs"][quote:post_uid0="Roll"]3) Forget Cammy, put in SAKURA! XD
sorry roll but SAKURA is not who we are talking about anyhow SAKURA is not a xm are a sf sorry roll :([/quote] Sakura is a street fighter man....she's one of the most famous ones too. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%