Actually, this would be great as a test to see how strong you are (in a way at least). It would be pretty cool to see how far you would go against 2 people (Say, Tarkan and Lord Cyris) before you lost, or if you're really good or lucky, you win.

GREAT IDEA !

after all, its like survival mode and those best player could prove once and for all that they are the best. plus, it gives a good challenge !

TMy, it's not a "not fair" situation, because the person thats the "1" is the one that chose this... right?

And yes, it'll be like the survival mode..
..to test your skill!

But, if it's too much work, just add it in the "to do list". :biggrin:

i wasen't asking u 2 do it straight away TMy. as ####### said. put it on ut 'to do' list if ur gonna add it that is...

yep, i like the idea, i thrive for challenges.

i think its a good idea, but most people would probably die. i think its a good idea that the 1 person should have ,i dont know, maybe... 150% health? (TMyApp: i think that if people would want to have a good challenge, they shouldn't have 200% health)

No No NO!!!

The "1" should still only have 100% health...

Survival Mode dang it.. think about it..

Or like the newer SF Games, make it that after one dies, yours automaticlaly gets about 15% health...
And also, like in the games, the opponents should come "One at a Time". Because Variables will kill anyone..

has any1 heard about lag?????
ok maybe what he meaans its handicapped matches
thats what he means
and anyways
lag would be impossible to fix

You can't FIX Lag.

And yes, we do mean Handicap matches, which is SAME THING as 2 on 1 (non-tag).

my bad
bugs and problems would be imposible to fix
why cant u call it handicap
####