SFO Archive Forums

SFO Archive Forums (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/index.php)
-   Challenges and Tournaments (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   2000warrior's first challenge... (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/showthread.php?t=3295)

DX Zero 04-08-2003 08:32 PM

hmm i accept.. however 2000warrior i must warn u.. i play like this all the time :D

bloodpack 04-09-2003 06:12 PM

this is the kind of challenge ive been looking for...
continous play
if i win once, i win the entire play
now im the kind of fighter who keeps coming back every time i get beaten...

time zone: philippines
availability: friday/saturday

blanka09 04-09-2003 07:10 PM

Although I regard myself as a novince I guess it wouldn't hurt to challenge you! :laugh:

04-11-2003 03:55 PM

Sorry I havn't been on people... (been crazy work trying to get senshuk nav. back up and run things in the "real world").

I should be a bit easier to find tommorow/Sunday, and most open during Spring Break (Mon-Fri).

SSJKarma 04-11-2003 04:17 PM

HOST does matter 2kwarrior... but you gotta know the basic of how it works to actually be better with it !

example:
Cable vs 56K (cable host) = good game, not so much lag...
56k vs 56k (1st 56k host) = good game, not so much lag...
56K vs cable (56K host) = damn laggy game ! (why ? because 56K host the game and it has no problem giving out the things he has to give. cable, have trouble following, why ? because it has twice the job it normally would have to do just to follow up the 56k, it also includes the fact that it =has to downgrade on the 56k to follow)

why do i know that ?
in every single game there is on the net...
UNREAL TOURNAMENT
QUAKE 3 ARENA
and the likes...
they all have that little phrase in their readme that syays this:"the one who has the fastest connection, should always host the games !"

it has been a fact for years now... better connection have always given better performance in online games if they were hosting !
so yeah... any 56k hosting a game will simply make the cable user lag as hell !
while if the inverse was hapenning... cable was hosting and the 56k had to follow... then it would be way better !

iTALY 04-11-2003 05:20 PM

I accept...we pik the same character....ur choice of who it is...and no quick match!!! ( i cant pik turbo in them)

so u just host

04-11-2003 05:45 PM

SSJKarma: Do you think I did not already know that?

I know just as much about the lag in this game as you do (as well as have both those games and experienced lag effects on them).

Not sure if this is still me not being able to understand the unorthodox way of your posts, but I get the impression that you're saying that cable users have the lag advantage on 56K hosters games. If you do mean to say that, then you're dead wrong. Try hosting with a 56K some time against a cable/dsl user and see what I'm talking about... the game's laggy as hell but the 56K still has the advantage by quite a lot. Or else try joining a cable user's game with a 56K... it's very laggy for the 56K user.

Anyways... debate your lag issues somewhere else. If you're not going to accept the challenge then don't bother posting.

Edit: Amazing... DXZero beat me on his first try. He stands as the first one to beat me on my own host in a LONG time.



Edited By 2000warrior on April 12 2003 at 17:56

pip99 04-12-2003 03:28 PM

http://www.boomspeed.com/pip99/shinchunli.GIF

enough said...that was a dam hard game.

04-12-2003 04:23 PM

Yes it was... as you should all know, I was using Chun li as well.

That makes 2 people who've proven they've got quite some considerable tallent.

DX Zero:
Attempts: 1
Wins: 1
Losses: 0

pip99:
Attempts: 2
Wins: 1
Losses: 1

I'm very impressed with you both. Congratulations upon your victories. You both would have killed me on your own hosts... :biggrin:

da_realX 04-12-2003 08:08 PM

didnt see ya today i was there. sunday at 3 warrior


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%

Page generated in 0.06371 seconds with 13 queries