[quote:post_uid0="Sportschick155"]hey! maybe this can actually work....we cant really judge right now................ ??? maybe good will actually come out of this :p[/quote]
Nothing good has ever came out fo America, and nothing ever will.

http://www.renewnyc.com/plan_des_dev...ges/Slide3.jpg
ok now thats gotta be the ugliest design ive seen so far. If they actual build that i wont visit NYC anymore.

Well Damn, Put the old ones back up. i am 22 years old, by the time they finish the wtc, i will be 77 years old. Besides, Those pic have a wack design. ???

damn that sux.
man i'll be too old to even be worrying about the towers when theyre finished

i have 1 thing to say if george bush wasnt a dum ass the attack would of never happened and the twin towers and wtc would be fine. but bush had to be a dumb ass and didnt take matters inti his hands when he was warned about an attack

u all think u be too old to see them huh?

http://encarta.msn.com/xrefmedia/sha...0/T010117A.jpg
these two only took 5 years to build. tower one was finished in 1972 and tower two in 1973. now if they just rebuild the exact same tower [and they better, i see to that] it might take a shorter time. and they should coat the steel frame work with 6" of concreate then put steel plates on.

i just hope those 'things', not even building, wont be built.

I'll be 61 by the time that project is finished...

he he he, you guys are funny. For me I don't think I want to live when I am in my late 30's. It's not that I don't like to live, its just that it is better to die at late 20's or 30's. I really hope I die saving people, and then become a legend to my family and maybe inspire them to live life happily. They're so negative. Anyways, those designs are really scary. I wonder when a great sydnicate will come to take over the world.

[quote:post_uid0="SolidSnake76"]u all think u be too old to see them huh?

http://encarta.msn.com/xrefmedia/sha...0/T010117A.jpg
these two only took 5 years to build. tower one was finished in 1972 and tower two in 1973. now if they just rebuild the exact same tower [and they better, i see to that] it might take a shorter time. and they should coat the steel frame work with 6" of concreate then put steel plates on.

i just hope those 'things', not even building, wont be built.[/quote]
Snake, you took the words right outta my keyboard..
But anyway... these might take longer..( If america isn't dumb again.)

Last WTC that was made, was made from BLOCKS.. instead of bricks..
like They just used allready built walls so it would be easy to make....

But if they take a bit longer and make it brick my brick or some other unique way, thenn the towers will actually stand..
Like if another plane hits 'em, they won't go down, the Plane will.

from what your saying asshole, bricks?

lets start a lesson in engineering.

a car moving at like 30mph can easily go through a brick wall. now the wind, forget the plane, will topple down a skyscraper made of bricks.

concrete can even withstand tornado wind speed.

i understood how the towers collasped:

the core of the buildings had drywall for walls instead of concrete[which they were thinking of using but didnt choose to put]. drywall may be resistant to fire but is very fragile after being set on fire. when the plane hit, the drywall was instantly blown away, exposing vulnerable parts i.e. the stairways.

the steel trusses held the buildings in shape from swaying and collaspe. they also had protective fire foam. but the plane's impact, well u know. due to that, the trusses were vulnerable to fire, started mealting and saging and they were weak enough to allow the floors to pancake on top of one another.

so asshole think of what ur saying. using bricks and another plane crashes into them, the entire lower manhattan area would be a real mess.

oh and i made a mistake. it took 9 years to build the towers.