SFO Archive Forums

SFO Archive Forums (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/index.php)
-   General (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Cloning - Are you against it? (http://nferno666.sytes.net/forums/showthread.php?t=15563)

Virtual Fighter 08-08-2005 05:54 PM

Quote:

^Yeah but What about People destroying Animals habitats???? huh. Let the world heal it self naturally like Solidsnake said.

Obviously you don't really care about that as you are using the internet which everyday is cutting down trees and land to put up receptors and telephone lines.

Secondly, what about it? Just because some people are going to clone animals, more animals will die? Where's the logic in that?

Quote:

Im not sure many people would think of eating a cloned animal as (pleasant)...
Animals are animals. Dolly the sheep would have tasted just as good in lamb chops as any other sheep.

You tell me, you look at all the poverty in Africa, Asia and south America and you say "No, I won't give you food because it's cloned. Yuck!"

Quote:

And tell me the reason to most animals being in danger of getting extinct, is it not humans who are responsible..or more to say [tecnology advancing] is more of the cause.
No Animals have become extinct in a long time. If you want to blame the destruction of animal habitats, blame it on deforistation.

Since when do scientists studying in a labratory destroy millions of trees in the rain forest, killing millions of animals?

Again, if you REALLY cared, you would stop using the internet as if makes carbon dioxide, which burns the earth's atmosphere, which flips up the global enviornment.

Why don't you just stop breathing, while you're at it, since that also destroys the global enviornment.

gieandfer 08-08-2005 06:11 PM

im with virtual on this. we need them for transplants, food, and other needs. hell if we really need it, we can even clone them for war so theyd stop recruiting people who dont wanna go but are forced to. u may think its wrong cause its like playing god but just think about it. is there any other way?

Virtual Fighter 08-08-2005 06:56 PM

Cloning humans not only would be really complicated, it would really be stupid and useless. Cloning animals, well there's something we can do to feed the world.

marvel911 08-08-2005 08:48 PM

[quote:post_uid0="(ShinKu_Ryu)"][quote:post_uid0="Virtual Fighter"]Hell yeah i'm for cloning.

If we clone animals we could end world hunger.



BUT NOOOOO. all you fliping bible thumpers wouldn't want the world to be fed, now would you?[/quote]
Im not sure many people would think of eating a cloned animal as (pleasant)...
[/quote]
Actually I'd agree. Although cloning animals good help, I see people refusing to eat something that's be cloned. People are too fussy.

Though then again all the cloned stuff could be sent to Africa, they wouldnt complain..

Virtual Fighter 08-08-2005 10:19 PM

If you put up the argument "eww, yucky, clone", then you're REALLY spoiled and have never faced hunger (both literal and hypothetical) in your life.

machine1 08-09-2005 04:40 AM

u know, virtual fighter made a strong point. I didn't consider the fact that we could produce more food and end world hunger. That kind of changes my opinion on cloning.

I'm definitly against the cloning of humans though. But that's the main problem, if they start cloning stuff like animals, eventually that will lead to the cloning of humans,which i'm AGAINST. So even though you think about how we could benefit from cloning, I see some big negatives as well.

so it's kind of a half/half thing now. I'm half for it and half against it.

(ShinKu_Ryu) 08-09-2005 10:59 AM

[quote:post_uid0="machine1"]I'm definitly against the cloning of humans though. But that's the main problem, if they start cloning stuff like animals, eventually that will lead to the cloning of humans,which i'm AGAINST. So even though you think about how we could benefit from cloning, I see some big negatives as well.

so it's kind of a half/half thing now. I'm half for it and half against it.
[/quote]
True what you said...though some only look at one thing, ''cloning animals for food to resolve world hunger". There is still way too many negatives to just put aside and deal with it later when it actually comes into effect.

History should have taught as not to neglect a situation untill it becomes a problem to deal with. Cloning cant be the last and only solution for world hunger, even if it happens i dont think it will help much..

(~Miguel~) 08-09-2005 12:20 PM

[color=Deep Sky Blue]
Quote:

Obviously you don't really care about that as you are using the internet which everyday is cutting down trees and land to put up receptors and telephone lines.

Secondly, what about it? Just because some people are going to clone animals, more animals will die? Where's the logic in that?
You dont care either but i use this computer for reasons. But cutting trees can be replaced by Planting trees.

Quote:

Animals are animals. Dolly the sheep would have tasted just as good in lamb chops as any other sheep.

You tell me, you look at all the poverty in Africa, Asia and south America and you say "No, I won't give you food because it's cloned. Yuck!"
Cloning is good but not natural, what if someone did a mistake and created something harmful??

Quote:

No Animals have become extinct in a long time. If you want to blame the destruction of animal habitats, blame it on deforistation.

Since when do scientists studying in a labratory destroy millions of trees in the rain forest, killing millions of animals?

Again, if you REALLY cared, you would stop using the internet as if makes carbon dioxide, which burns the earth's atmosphere, which flips up the global enviornment.

Why don't you just stop breathing, while you're at it, since that also destroys the global enviornment.
If you really cared you would protest against The ones who are cutting trees. Again i use this computer for a reason. To study find info and play a game. Actually scientists do harm the environment, They might kill us. Im not saying science is bad but somethings are just to dangerous.[/color]



Edited By (~Miguel~) on 1123615972

gieandfer 08-09-2005 01:36 PM

even if cloning humans did lead to problems o well. we already have enough problems. yea we could clone animals but that would also be a problem. it would mean more diseases, more animals the pound has to take care of, and other problems. its not like cloning will bring an end to all of our conflicts

Elena 08-09-2005 03:01 PM

I'm all for cloning parts. Parts of healthy humans such as hearts and kidneys for those who need it so they don't die before getting a part. Scientist could clone a part of each blood type.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 0%

Page generated in 0.06099 seconds with 13 queries