this is now become one of those 'do or die' situations...

bloodpack: You wouldn't mind elaborating on those "hidden agendas" would you? (provided that you do know some specifics on them).

SSJKarma: Not sure where you're getting osama from... but if you look at this news article, it pretty clearly states how Osama is calling Saddam a "socialist infidel" (therefore negating any GW Bush claims that Iraq is affiliated with al Qaeda.

Rest of your response is pretty solid... 1 question though:
Do you believe that the US should back Turkey in case of Iraqi aggression?



Edited By 2000warrior on Feb. 15 2003 at 10:08

[quote:post_uid0="2000warrior"]1 question though:
Do you believe that the US should back Turkey in case of Iraqi aggression?[/quote]
Turkey is a part of the UN..if one country attacks a nation of the UN...the rest of the UN nations defend the attacked country....thats the way it is suppose to work.

Should the US defend turkey...No
Not that turkey shouldnt be defended.
but the US has it's hands full with Iraq at the moment.
So the 'impartial' UN nations that are neither here nor there on the US attacking Iraq should be put in charge of defending Turky if Iraq invades them.



Edited By nosoul4evr on Feb. 15 2003 at 12:02

well ur sayin the un will protect an attacked country so is the us part of the un cuz if they r we shud be gettin sum reinforcement sumtime rite

im reel ANTI-WAR but wen it comes to stuff like this war it sets me ff we shud just go in for one major kill instead of attack the countrys and soldiers trak down thats osama bin bastard and gun his ass same wit sadam sneak attack wen they least expect it and pleez dun flame me for these oppinions becuz its what i think no1 can stop me from my thots cuz i wudnt to u pure massacre by silverchair lisen to it