Team battle - 3on3, but not tag team

[Dreadlocks]

you know how some games like SFA3 or Tekken have those 3on3 battles where each character takes turns fighting 1on1 until someone dies, then the next person comes in to replace them, and you keep going until all 3 team members die, then the other team wins. It's not a bad idea. Since it's only taking turns 1on1, there should be no lag, and it would be the coolest thing to try to add unto the game.


P.S. what ever happen to my "changing marve|" topic in the Genernal Comments section?

[Nferno666]

well 3 on 3 was mention along time ago and tmy said no to it cause it would cause way more lag that normal

[SSJKarma]

well, he said no tags, which means not all 3 at the same time which brings up the lag excuses to a minimum, cause its still true that the game will be affected by the number fo player on the server !

but the true way to say no to this, is by the example given below...

EXAMPLE:
you're playing the match, you're 2 in line and you fight newbs and the likes. but you're second and by that you have to wait for the first guy to be defeated, but he never is. so you waited a whole 15 minutes for nothing. and the game is finish there is no more opponents to fight.

see, that would make the game boring and not many would play this.
people in tags already wants to play a lot and aren't even staying in the fights if they cannot fight because of stupid guy who can't tags !

why would they want to take the chance on this mode ?
its just insane to wait that many time just to not fight at all !
now i made the example for a second player in line, now imagine the third one, believe me this is a very bad idea for a multiplayer play. but would be good for single player tho !

[Scaggs]

That is true but what Dreadlocks said does said kinda fun.

Ousha!
Scaggs :D

[Nferno666]

yeah but what if the others on your team don't have the patients to be waiting for there turn to come in or what if it never gets to be their turn because 1 guy finishes off all 3 on him own :D sure easy pts but i'm sure they wanted some action

[alamgir]

Do u mean like team battle?

[sjc2199]

you know how some games like SFA3 or Tekken have those 3on3 battles where each character takes turns fighting 1on1 until someone dies, then the next person comes in to replace them, and you keep going until all 3 team members die, then the other team wins. It's not a bad idea. Since it's only taking turns 1on1, there should be no lag, and it would be the coolest thing to try to add unto the game.


P.S. what ever happen to my "changing marve|" topic in the Genernal Comments section?
i know what youtalking abuot, you mean somethingl ike King Of the Fighters right, that's a great idea because it will cut down on lag, so the play may be way more smoother

[ledmonkey]

6 ppl.....Like a 2v2 match with 2 observers......Lot's of bugs....Lot's of lag...

[Nferno666]

well why would you want to let ppl observe...that's why if your gonna let some1 watch it should only be 1 person...2 at max but no more than that...plus many observers get bored and leave like 2 minutes after watching

[milestails]

Team battles?... No, I wouldn't say it was a good idea. It would slow down lag yeah... But if a very good person is in front... That's where the problem is... *Sigh*... :)

[Nferno666]

well since i don't like "partners" it would probably be good to be all 3 characters and once one dies you become the other instead of having some1 else(if you do have partner) go in

[blanka09]

well since i don't like "partners" it would probably be good to be all 3 characters and once one dies you become the other instead of having some1 else(if you do have partner) go in
lol.. you have to put a little bit of faith in your partners.. :biggrin:
But I think I'll have to agree with SSJKarma on this one.. You wait for about 14 minutes and nothing..b'cos your other 2 partners were sooo good.. they killed 3.. :biggrin:

[Nferno666]

lol faith? i have no faith in them...every time i am with a partner i either do everything on my own(cause they die instantly or just leave) and i have bad experineces with parnters and try to avoid being put with one...

[ledmonkey]

well why would you want to let ppl observe...that's why if your gonna let some1 watch it should only be 1 person...2 at max but no more than that...plus many observers get bored and leave like 2 minutes after watching
Sometimes I play in games and the host doesn't kick the observer like I tell them to. It's really stupid cause observers can press mp and mk and throw unlimited helpers.

[Nferno666]

well i'm not sure that bug works anymore....or at least it hasn't happened to me yet

[ledmonkey]

Yea tmy proly fixed it, an that was the last time I played a match with observers

[Dreadlocks]

if they can put this mode in the game, then the game could be like KOF...hopefully they can try putting the character waiting idle in the background

[silent-killer]

Team battles?... No, I wouldn't say it was a good idea. It would slow down lag yeah... But if a very good person is in front... That's where the problem is... *Sigh*... :)
i agree but it will also being a lot of error reports on the game because of shockwave! :alien:

[(Blanka2k3)]

its sounds good but think about the lag in the game that will be way so much.. ???

[silent-killer]

and a easy way to freeze your computer!!!

[HELLOTHERE]

i dont really fight with a partner because im not patient enough and lots of the new people dont know how to tag!!!



Edited By HELLOTHERE on Nov. 23 2003 at 17:59

[Nferno666]

well this topic has changed from 3 on 3 to why not to be with a partner so there no more needed to say here...